Strategy — Series B Financial Modeling & Strategic Valuation
We deliver strategic financial modeling and valuation for growth‑stage companies. Series B preparation, multi‑methodology valuation, exit readiness, and board‑level financial governance — built on a structured, repeatable financial infrastructure.
Common Deficiencies at This Stage
- Strategic decisions presented to the board without a financial model to support them
- Series B preparation underway without a thirty‑six month forecast or documented assumption layer
- Valuation stated as a target rather than derived from cross‑referenced methodologies
- Waterfall analysis across exit scenarios absent from the financial infrastructure
- Capital allocation decisions made without a build vs buy or market entry financial analysis
What the Engagement Delivers
- Strategic decision model analyzing the primary capital allocation decision: build vs buy, market entry, product expansion, or defined equivalent, with scenarios and a stated financial recommendation
- Series B preparation model: thirty‑six month forecast, three internally consistent scenarios with documented operating logic, fully loaded headcount model
- Board‑level scenario analysis presenting financial implications across the board‑facing metrics: revenue run rate, gross margin, EBITDA margin, and runway to next milestone
- Multi‑methodology valuation cross‑referenced across at minimum two approaches, with documented valuation range and sensitivity analysis on the three most material assumptions
- Financial data room at Level 3 compliance, updated to the currency standards appropriate for an institutional growth equity investor
- Exit readiness model: waterfall across a minimum of twenty exit scenarios, preferred return calculations per share class, strategic vs financial acquirer analysis
Compliance Level Delivered
Selected Outcome
The company was preparing for a Series B raise and a simultaneous board decision on establishing a second manufacturing facility in a lower‑cost jurisdiction. Neither decision had a financial model to support it. The board had requested a written financial recommendation by the next quarterly meeting, fourteen days away. We built a build vs establish decision model comparing internal establishment costs against contract manufacturing economics across five volume scenarios with a sensitivity analysis on the labor cost differential assumption, a Series B preparation model with three scenarios and a full sensitivity analysis on the technology adoption rate assumption, and a valuation analysis using discounted cash flow and comparable company analysis cross‑referenced against eight peer companies current as of the month preceding the board meeting. Both models were delivered with four days to spare.
We apply a rigorous financial modeling framework — what we term financial infrastructure — to ensure every strategic engagement is complete and defensible. For context on the earlier stages, see our financial modeling for Series A guide and the investor‑ready model checklist. Companies at this stage also benefit from our financial modeling and valuation overview.
Related Sectors
Oakworth Portal
Engagement starts from the Oakworth Portal section.